Skip to main content

Free article section

You are reading a Free article. Apply for a subscription to access all the valuable information on the website Sports Law & Taxation

E-Sports: Epic v. Apple

By Emre Bilginoglu, Attorney-at-Law, Istanbul, Turkey

Epic Games (for more information on its activities and its aims and objectives, log onto: continue their legal battle with Apple and Google, which began last summer.

Epic Games’ main argument is that the 30% commission charged by both companies for using their app stores is anti-competitive.

Epic Games have expanded the battle on various fronts, including the EU, the UK and Australia. A complaint has been filed at the EU Competition Directorate (the EU Anti-Trust Body) for Apple’s allegedly anti-competitive action.  

The outcome of these lawsuits and complaints has already resulted in some positive impact for the developers and consumers.

Apple has announced its business program for developers with a reduced price of 15% commission.  

Whilst, meanwhile, Epic Games have their own digital video game store that works with the developers for a revenue cut of 12%, unlike Steam which currently has a 30% revenue cut.

Epic Games are competing for a bigger share of the gaming market, giving away free games each week on its store.

Competition, in a business/legal sense, is always beneficial for consumers and lawyers.

There is so much, therefore, to play for in an ever-expanding and lucrative video games’ market, particularly as the COVID-19 world-wide Pandemic has demonstrated!

Emre Bilginoglu, who is also admitted to practise Law in the State of New York, USA, may be contacted by e-mail at ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Interesting article?

Take your own subscription to get easy online access to all valuable articles of Sports Law & Taxation