Football: English Premier League Profit and Sustainability Rules and the Chelsea Hotel Loophole

By Ennio Bovolenta, Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich, Switzerland

Introduction

The English Premier League Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) were introduced to promote financial health and competitive fairness by curbing excessive spending and focusing on limiting the losses clubs can incur over three consecutive seasons.

Clubs are allowed to incur a maximum loss of £105 million within this period, but with specific conditions: up to £90 million of these losses must be covered by "secure funding" from the club's owners, ensuring that any financial support strengthens the club rather than increasing debt.

Additionally, the PSR encourage clubs to invest in long-term sustainability by allowing exemptions for certain costs, such as the deduction of those related to youth development, infrastructure, and community projects. These exemptions incentivize clubs to spend on initiatives that contribute to their future growth rather than focusing solely on immediate financial gains.

The Chelsea Hotel Loophole

Chelsea Football Club recently exploited a loophole in the PSR by selling two hotels on their Stamford Bridge site to a sister company owned by the club’s parent consortium. The sale generated approximately £75.6 million, which was then used to offset Chelsea’s financial losses and bring them closer to compliance with the PSR rules.

Without this transaction, Chelsea would have reportedly posted losses of £248.5 million for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. However, by including the profit from the hotel sale in their PSR calculations, the club reduced its reported losses to £90.1 million, narrowly avoiding breaching the £105 million threshold.

This operation sparked controversy as it highlighted a significant loophole in the PSR, allowing clubs to sell assets to related entities to manipulate their financial statements.

The Premier League Response

In response to Chelsea’s actions, the Premier League proposed an amendment to the PSR at its Annual General Meeting (AGM) in June 2024. This amendment aimed to close the loophole by prohibiting clubs from using profits generated from the sale of tangible assets—such as stadiums, training grounds, and hotels—in their PSR calculations. The intention was to prevent clubs from artificially inflating their financial health by selling assets to related entities.

However, the proposal was narrowly defeated, with only 11 out of the 20 clubs voting in favour, falling short of the two-thirds majority needed to ratify the rule change. As a result, the loophole remains open, allowing clubs to continue using similar strategies to comply with the PSR.

Despite the defeat, the Premier League is apparently considering a fresh bid to close the loophole. With new financial rules set to be introduced from the 2025-26 season, there is growing pressure to address all existing loopholes before these new measures come into effect.

One of the key upcoming changes should be the "squad cost rule," which will limit the amount a club can spend on player wages and transfers to 85% of their revenue, further promoting financial sustainability.

Implications for Financial Regulation

The Chelsea hotel loophole has significant implications for the future of financial regulation in the Premier League. Critics argue that the current rules allow wealthier clubs with valuable assets to exploit financial regulations, creating an uneven playing field. This situation raises concerns about the effectiveness of the PSR in promoting genuine financial sustainability.

The failure to close the loophole at the Premier League AGM indicates differing opinions amongst clubs about the best approach to financial regulation. Some clubs may prioritize flexibility in managing their finances, whilst others advocate for stricter controls to ensure fair competition. As the Premier League continues to navigate the complexities of modern football finance, the challenge will be to strike a balance between maintaining financial oversight and accommodating the realities of the sport.

Conclusion

The Chelsea hotel loophole underscores the ongoing challenges of financial regulation in football, the world’s most lucrative sport. Whilst the PSR rules are designed to promote sustainability and fairness, the ability to sell assets to related entities reveals vulnerabilities within the system.

As clubs continue to explore creative ways to comply with financial regulations, the Premier League must carefully consider how to strengthen its financial rules to ensure both competitive fairness and financial integrity in the ‘beautiful game’!

For further information, log onto: ‘www.valloni.ch’