South Africa: Transgender Eligibility in Sport and the UK Supreme Court Ruling
By Razia Mahomed, School of Law, UNISA, Pretoria, South Africa
The question of transgender eligibility in sport has sparked widespread debate in recent years, particularly around the participation of transgender women in competitive female categories. A recent ruling by the UK Supreme Court has added fuel to this ongoing global conversation, raising new questions about fairness, inclusion, and how legal definitions of sex and gender should influence sports policies.
Whilst the UK decision directly affects only English law, its ripple effects are being felt in countries like South Africa, where sports governance is influenced by both international standards and national legislation.
What Did the UK Supreme Court Decide?
In a landmark ruling, the UK Supreme Court clarified that, under the Equality Act 2010, the term "woman" refers specifically to biological sex — not gender identity. Lord Hodge, delivering the judgment, emphasized that this interpretation was not a comment on gender identity in general, but rather a legal clarification meant to aid regulatory compliance and statutory interpretation.
The Court stated that the concept of sex is binary and that having a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC), which legally affirms a person’s gender, does not change one’s biological sex for the purpose of the Equality Act.
This decision has already prompted changes in the UK sports landscape. Major sports governing bodies, like the Football Association and the England and Wales Cricket Board, have adopted policies that exclude transgender women from female categories — not because the ruling mandates it, but to align their policies with the clarified legal definition of sex.
What Are South Africa’s Current Policies?
In South Africa, the Constitution and the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act (PEPUDA) (Act 4 of 2000) protects individuals from unfair discrimination based on gender or gender identity. Furthermore, the Alteration of Sex Description and Sex Status Act (Act 49 of 2003) allows transgender individuals to legally change their sex on official documents.
Despite these legal protections, sports policies remain complex and somewhat inconsistent across the country. South African sports organizations frequently defer to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in resolving eligibility disputes. CAS decisions have significantly shaped local approaches, particularly regarding doping and gender-related regulations.
For instance, Athletics South Africa (ASA) follows rules set by World Athletics, which require transgender and DSD (Differences of Sexual Development) athletes to maintain testosterone levels below a certain threshold to compete in female events. South African athlete Caster Semenya famously challenged these regulations, eventually bringing her case to the European Court of Human Rights, where she succeeded in a discrimination claim — yet, paradoxically, remains barred from competition under current rules.
Whilst South Africa generally aligns its policies with international standards, the lack of a unified national policy means that sports federations and schools adopt varying approaches. Some promote inclusion, whilst others implement stricter eligibility requirements. This legal grey area creates uncertainty, particularly in high-contact sports where safety and fairness are strongly debated.
A New Avenue for Dispute Resolution?
In an effort to bring more clarity and consistency to local sport, the National Sport and Recreation Amendment Bill proposes the creation of a Sports Arbitration Tribunal. If enacted, this could provide a local platform for resolving disputes, including those involving transgender athletes — reducing reliance on international bodies like CAS.
What Could the UK Ruling Mean for South Africa?
Although not legally binding in South Africa, the UK Supreme Court decision may influence the country's policies and public discourse in several ways:
- Policy Revisions: Local sports bodies may review or update their eligibility criteria to align with emerging international trends.
- Legal Challenges: The ruling could inspire legal debates around the intersection of gender identity and sport in the South African legal system.
- Public Conversation: As the topic gains more attention, it may spark wider discussion on how to balance inclusion with fairness in competitive sport.
Final Thoughts
The UK Supreme Court ruling marks a significant moment in the global conversation about sex, gender, and sport. For South Africa, it presents both a challenge and an opportunity — to reflect on its existing frameworks and consider how best to ensure that sporting environments are inclusive, fair, and legally sound.
As this conversation continues, it is essential to involve diverse voices and prioritize the dignity and rights of all athletes.
A very difficult balancing act!
The Author may be contacted by e-mail at ‘
